Rowland V Divall (1923)	S 12 TITLE
Harlingdon & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art (1991)	S 13 DESCRIPTION exception
Priest v Last (1903)	S 14(3) FITNESS FOR PURPOSE
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)	DUTY OF CARE
Haley v LEB (1965)	Reasonable foresight
Bourhill v Young (1943)	Close and proximate relationship
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1989)	Fair and reasonable to impose a duty
Spartan Steel v Martin (1973)	Consequential economic loss – yes
Weller v Foot & Mouth Research Institute (1966)	Pure economic loss – no
Barnett v Chelsea Hospital (1969)	Causation
The Wagon Mound (No 1) (1961)	Remoteness
Smith v Leech Brain (1962)	‘thin skull rule’
Beale v Taylor (1967)	S 12 DESCRIPTION
Bernstein v Pamson Motors (1987)	a reasonable period of time